# Tuesday, 07 September 2010

So I've been greeted by this message when I tried to login to Facebook.

image

So... ok I tried to add my phone and I see this.

image

Maxis not being in I picked the My Mobile Service Provider Isn't Listed link. And I eventually get to this window.

image

Since I didn't get me code, I decided to let them know. But....

image

WHAT THE HELL !?!?!?!?


Tuesday, 07 September 2010 21:25:59 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, 05 September 2010

I’m a heavy user of Microsoft Onenote, Since it’s very first version, on my very first Tablet PC. Well,  times have changed now and I now have 2 machines instead of just one Tablet PC. My main workhorse system (currently a Dell XPS 13), and then there’s my meeting/ideas Tablet PC (Currently the Asus T101MT). The OneNote notebook is stored in the Dell, whereas the Tablet syncs the files from the Dell using a password protected fileshare.

You might ask why I didn’t make use of the excellent sync to web feature by putting my notebook on Skydrive? Well that’s a GREAT feature, I just found out that it doesn’t end well when you have audio/video recordings in your notebooks cause it obviously tries to upload those as well.

Recently I was looking through my Tablet PC strategy and realized that it is pretty much an expandable system. In the sense that, if I ever lose it (knock on wood) The data should be replaceable, and I need to try and protect the data as much as possible. (My Onenote holds… well… a LOT of information that can’t fall into the wrong hands)

My first thought was obviously to set OneNote to sync to a BitLocker To Go secured SD Card, but then I saw this under Options -> Save & Backup –> Cache File Location.

onenotecache

Oh crap.. they specifically mentioned that you CAN’T toss the cache file location into a removable drive. thought that was it, and my dreams of having a protected storage were shattered. That’s when I remembered a command I learnt when I was hacking some Windows Protected Files. MKLINK.

In short, MKLINK allows you to make one folder point to another folder. And then to any program that access it, it’ll be seeing the stub folder instead of the real one.

Given that piece of information, all I had to do was run the command in the command prompt as such

MKLINK /J C:\MYFOLDER\MYSTUBFOLDER F:\SDCARDFOLDER

So now c:\myfolder\mystubfolder  can be used to refer to the sync folder on my BitLocker’ed SD Card, and I can happily set that as the Cache File Location in Onenote and it’ll not complain. Yippee!!!

But there’s a few gotchas for this scenario, first of all, since this is just a dirty ugly hack. Starting Onenote when the SD card isn’t mounted, not unlocked, or mounted in the wrong drive. OneNote throws up.

onenotecrash

So, try to make sure you are familiar with how to adjust your SD Card’s drive letters, or are prepared to recreated the junction with MKLINK so you can make sure that OneNote can find the cache folder without any problems.

The other gotcha was that, I didn’t realize that BitLocker To Go doesn’t relock on resume from standby. Hmmmm.. I guess that was for convinience sake. I do have a user password to login from standby so I guess it’s not like someone can just access my system if they find it in standby form. Though it is something to note when using BitLocker To Go.

UPDATE: This will not work in Onenote 2013, so you will need to make a VHD on the external media instead, you can check it out here.


Sunday, 05 September 2010 23:39:36 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, 01 September 2010

I'm ready to throw in the towel and just decline any form of Windows Client application if the client has their mind set on creating the worlds greatest application and decide that they should have full control of the OS.


Wednesday, 01 September 2010 21:56:40 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
# Tuesday, 31 August 2010

My search for the best tablet pc to write on continues, and this time the subject is the Asus T101MT

DSC09930

The T101MT is an 10 inch SVGA widescreen (1024x600) Intel Atom N450 powered Netbook class PC so it's basic performance parameters are pretty much the same as any of the recent N450 Netbooks such as the Lenovo S10-3T.

DSC09936

Inside it looks pretty plain and simple with not much in the sense of bells and whistles. You get a Chiclet style keyboard.

DSC09943

Which I can't tell you how well it works because I have been running an experiment to keep off the keyboard for as long as possible. As is typical for convertible Tablet PCs, the screen hinge rotates in only one direction.

DSC09944

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the term Tablet PC, that means the T101MT's screen can be folded 180 degrees and closed down on the keyboard to become a writing pad.

DSC09960

Unlike the Lenovo S10-3T though the Asus T101MT reaches the This feels quite a bit heavy region due partly to the higher capacity battery.

DSC09958

Depending on your usage and how you choose to throttle the CPU using Asus's Super Hybrid Engine app, you should be able to get around 3 ~ 4 hours of battery life.

The Asus T101MT does not have an accelerometer and thus doesn't do auto screen rotation (which I absolutely HATE!) Instead you press and hold on to a button beside the power button to rotate the screen.

DSC09942

As it is a full sized netbook, the Asus T101MT doesn't skimp on ports. You get all 3 USB ports in total, and the whole shebang of standard connectors at the back.

DSC09954

The main exhaust port is on the left side, along with the audio out and SD Card slot.

DSC09951

And now for the people who are interested in modding the T101MT, the bottom panel.

DSC09956

After I went through the shock of not seeing the usual regulatory stickers, Windows key stickers, serial number, etc. etc. (they're all under the battery) I noticed the lone panel on the back. That's the EXTRA memory slot. The Asus T101MT ships with 1GB of RAM... INSIDE the system underneath the keyboard, also known as the serious modders access only location. So you can add one extra GB of RAM while the additional slot, problem is that... because there's already one piece of RAM in the system, any other piece you get would have to work well with the preexisting one, so be sure to boot into Windows and crunch some numbers when buying additional RAM to ensure that the new RAM you bought works fine with the existing one.

Asus is not scared of Steve Jobs whole It's Wrong To Have A Stylus spew, and has a magnetic stylus silo on the right side of the screen.

DSC09945

Not just any cheap piece of plastic, it has a metal body giving it weight and feels like you're holding a real pen.

DSC09946

And it extends to a more reasonable pen like length.

DSC09947

And now let's talk about the touch screen, now we come to the one reason that I was willing to go through the wrath of my wife screaming "You bought ANOTHER ONE?!?!?!" to get the Asus T101MT. My whole purpose in getting Tablet PCs is to find that best machine to bring to meetings, write notes on, and brain storm on. And the Asus T101MT's touchscreen is almost close to being the perfect thing to write on.

First of all, it's a resistive screen instead of a capacitive one. Not as good as a real digitizer but a resistive screen is much better to write on than a capacitive one as I mentioned here.

Then it has 2 point multitouch so once app developers finally start making mutlitouch aware apps for Windows 7 you can use them properly.

But those reasons are not what tipped the scales in favor of risking the wrath of my wife vs living a calm peaceful life. Smile with tongue out What tipped the scales was that.

The Asus T101MT's touchscreen has PALM REJECTION.

I've seen palm rejection in resistive touchscreens before with my Fujitsu P1610 and U1010. They worked, but still left quite a bit to be desired.

After testing the Asus T101MT's palm rejection in the shop, I knew that I had to have it! While testing it in the shop I found that it could detect the palm and reject input from it 95% of the time! So I was elated when I found that out.

The main difference between the T101MT's palm rejection and the previous ones I used was that you have to specifically turn it on by running a program which Asus docks to the task bar. That's probably why it works so well, because in previous cases the touchscreen was basically trying to guess between what's valid input and what's not. Whereas for the T101MT the user specifically tells it that they ONLY want stylus points to be detected and nothing else.

As I was writing around in OneNote and in Journal I suddenly noticed something, my ink input looked different... it looked as if... the touchscreen was supplying Windows with PRESSURE INFORMATION!

Which means that not only did the touch screen do palm rejection, it was pressure sensitive as well! Which made it a very interesting touch screen indeed, and such an interesting touch screen deserves a video!

But... alas it is still not perfect, while the palm rejection works very well, it seems to falter at times, and fails to detect pen inputs. Not enough to call it a failure, but enough for me to get nit picky about. Still, it is by far the BEST Palm Rejection I've used outside of a digitizer! And that's saying a lot!

After using the T101MT, I sincerely wish that Asus is gonna put this same touchscreen (or an even better one!) on their Windows 7 powered slates in the future (hopefully something that's 10", anything bigger is too bulky to be called a pad).

So what's the verdict? If you're looking for an affordable tablet pc to write on NOW, I don't see why the Asus T101MT won't work for you. If you can wait, there should be better things come in the future, and of course if you have the money. You can go for one of the tablets which offer a hybrid digitizer for the BEST writing experience!


Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:31:08 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, 30 August 2010

Toys are interesting things, and I like to buy toys which seem to have uses sort of funky technology application or systems design. Because it's always neat that sometimes you see some interesting application of tech and design on something that's designated as a toy. But I guess the things I've been working on for the past few weekends don't exactly count as toys. First of all there's this.

DSC09842

This is a Kamen Rider Double Cyclone Joker 1/8 SCALE MODEL. If you still don't get it.. it's a MODEL, as in cut from plastic frames and build up with your own bare hands type of scale model. But.. from a far it looks just like any other toy statue figure, on close inspection though.

DSC09845

You can see where I cut the parts from the frame, the flaws of the middle black line, the decals, etc. etc. So why did I get this? Quite simply I wanted to see why the heck is Bandai getting into this market, because I had one question in my head. Which was there're many many MANY MANY companies that make figures and other collectibles, and they pride themselves in making detailed figures. So why is Bandai making a line that's basically requires the customer to try and make a figure look as good as the others? Because unpainted and unfinished, a model will never be able to compete with a retail figure.

After completing this model though I guess I can see some of the appeal, first of all the figure is HUGE!!!! It is at 1/8th scale, which makes it stand at about 24CM high. It's actually quite posable given the fact that it's just a model. Secondly, If I had the proper equipment and skills to finish the model properly it's basically cheaper than a model that stands this high.

While there is value here if you are the type that builds models, if you're more of the I'd like to have to cool figure to put on display you should probably avoid this even if you really like the character.

And at the same time I got the Kamen Rider I also got this.

DSC09899

It's a GUNDAM! I never thought I'd get another Gundam in my life considering my previous experiences with them. Also I know I totally lack the skill to make a Gundam look decent. But... this is no ordinary Gundam model. This is a 1/144 REAL GRADE Gundam RX-78-2, it's a SMALL model, but the complexity, detail and posability of the model is very high!

DSC09881

You'll only feel astonished by the degree of posability if you're familiar with Gundam models in general. Detail wise, before painting the model already posses some nice detailing due to the use of different colored plastics.

DSC09890

And here's a Zoom.It version for people to see how detailed it is, and how crummy my decal job was.

It even comes with a CORE FIGHTER! (Again... only Gundam fans would appreciate this).

DSC09893

And it's a WORKING CORE FIGHTER! (Wheels have to removed though)

DSC09897

But.... the instructions to make the Core Fighter comes AFTER finishing the main model, and I couldn't for the heck of me remove the placeholder piece to insert the Core Fighter in, so I guess I'll just leave it outside.

DSC09895

Why did I get this? Was it for the detailing? No... I'm not a Gunpla enthusiast so I don't care about that. I was more interested in the fact that the joints, eg. knees, elbows, waist. are in COMPLETED form on the parts frame. You don't have to put the together, you just snap it off, trim off some places where they secured the movable bits and.. it's done! It's amazing to me since I'm still wondering how they manage to mold movable pieces of plastic together in the tree without increasing costs too much.

Even though it's small... or maybe because it's small, this was one HECK of a complicated model to make! Due to the misread of the instructions I accidentally broke an armour plating on the leg, and cut off something I should have pulled out! I haven't even stuck the stickers on yet! I'm no Gunpla enthusiast, but I guess if you want to get the gist of how complicated these things can get without having to shell out loads of money on a 1/60 PERFECT GRADE this would give you an idea of how much trouble the real enthusiast go through making their masterpieces. In total I think I spent half a day trying to put this thing together!

And.. quick size comparison picture

DSC09912

The Beam Saber is TALLER than the Gundam itself... does it have something to prove?

ps. I know... the lighting in these pics are HORRIBLE, I'm not used to either taking things that are this big and errr.. tall. And also things which are small and tiny. Come on.. look at my shooting setup? I guess I'd consider a lightbox if I actually make money off this site. Smile with tongue out

DSC00385


Monday, 30 August 2010 00:11:58 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [1]  |