Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Yes I realized it's a bit late to make a first look video, but there's a lot to talk about the device so I'm going to break it down into a few areas starting with of course.. the physical appearance of the device.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:16:23 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, July 14, 2008

As I was feeding WZ yesterday night, his hand reached up and grabbed my hand that was holding the bottle. At first I thought he just wanted to hold my hand, then I realized the tugging motion he was putting on my hand, he wanted to throw my hand away! Then he reached both hands up beside the bottle and I realized what he wanted, I let go of the bottle as his hands closed in on it.

Usually 2 seconds later he'll let go, but this time... this time he hung on, this time he actually tilted the bottle to drink, this time he was actually drinking himself!

He pulled out the bottle from his mouth, and then with a quick motion he stabbed it back into his mouth.

But he missed and stabbed it into his nostril instead.

I pulled it out before too much milk got in. :P

But he actually managed to finish the bottle ALL BY HIMSELF!!!

It's ABOUT DANG TIME!! :P

Monday, July 14, 2008 1:44:36 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Is so that you don't have to ask someone if a particular element is needed or not.

Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:14:18 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, July 07, 2008

You basically have 2 options of uploading files to the Silverlight Streaming services, either you use the application management page over at silverlight.live.com or you could use the WebDAV API and upload files via your own code.

To upload through the website you need to zip up the contents of your application and upload the entire zip file in one go. It's an absolute nail biting experience when trying to upload a 50MB file from my connection cause I know that all it takes is one little hiccup and I have to reupload EVERYTHING again.

Using the WebDAV API you can basically write a program that can upload all the files in your Silverlight application one by one onto the services, the advantage of doing so is of course you only have to reupload failed files in case of failure.

But one problem which I was having was that I kept getting an idle disconnection error whenever my upload took more than 5 minutes, and since I'm now uploading video files which are much much bigger than 2MB this was a problem. I thought it was my code but after refering to the WebDAV sample I realised that my code was similar to the sample.

Finally after testing out some more fixes and theories I think I finally found out what the problem was. So in relation to the sample provided I did the following changes.

  • Instead of reading the entire file and then writing it to the request stream in one go, I pushed chunks of it say... 64kB chunks at a time.
  • Set readwritetimeout  and timeout of the HTTPWebRequest object to integer.maxvalue (which basically means infinite timeout..... somehow I don't think this is such a good idea or really has anything to do with the actual problem, will test it with a more practical value and see)
  • and most importantly HTTPWebRequest.SendChunked  was set to true.

Setting SendChunked to true immediatelly allowed me to spend 80 minutes uploading a 25MB file so I think that should be the main thing to concentrate on.

UPDATE

After some discussions with Bill Reiss over at the Silverlight forums it seems like SendChunked is not the best way to get it to work. Setting AllowWriteStreamBuffering to FALSE and Preauthenticate to TRUE seems to work just as well, and seems to be faster too!

Monday, July 07, 2008 10:10:17 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
 Sunday, July 06, 2008

The last time I did this I told myself I'd tried to make it last for more than a year this time. See... I even wrote it down in a new year resolution. But... on June 9th 2008... I broke that resolution... And I was so close to actually making the C730 last a year...

DSC02890

Meet the HTC Touch Diamond. Yes I've come full circle back to a Pocket PC device again.... oh well.. On paper the specs for the device sound very impressive.

  • Windows Mobile 6.1
  • VGA Screen
  • First WM device to carry Opera 9.5 browser, which enables almost full desktop like browsing on the device.
  • Tilt sensor (I HATE AutoRotation features!)
  • 3.2MP Opticial Focus camera

And it sports some nifty tricks too. EPIC video review to come... once I work out the script. :P

Sunday, July 06, 2008 11:07:12 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 

Here's the 1st of the 2 pieces of gear which I wanted to talk about. The Logitech Dinovo Mini Bluetooth keyboard... thumbboard. Silverlight needed to watch this video review.

I wonder, do people prefer higher quality video, but at the cost of having to wait for the video to download or do they just want to watch things as fast as possible?

Sunday, July 06, 2008 2:24:10 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, July 05, 2008

DSC03086

No, WZ cannot yet write words, even though he does recognize certain alphabets already. Now he just scribbles on the pad.

DSC03076

Grandma again has done an incredible job at teaching WZ how to properly hold the pen. When we see him holding it the wrong way we're supposed to tell him to hold it properly and he'll correct himself.

DSC03090

Unfortunately his word of correcting his grip on the pen is the push the tip with his left hand...

DSC03091

Which means a VERY DIRTY left hand!

Saturday, July 05, 2008 9:36:58 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
As I was following WZ around with the camera for a while I managed to capture one of the little adventures that WZ has around the house.
Saturday, July 05, 2008 9:18:50 PM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [1]  | 

Another interesting thing that happens during work. We receive some content to be entered onto a webpage from our copywriters, we copy the text from the mail, and paste it into our webpage. It looks fine when we pasted it in Visual Studio but then when other people look at it they see SOMETHING like this.

image

So you take a close look at the file and notice that where all the weird symbols were appearing is basically where an approstophe.. (Damn I can't spell it.. the ' in 's and 're)  is supposed to be, so the correct text should look like this.

image

So... what went wrong? Let see another example.

image

See the difference now? Still not yet? Look at the ', doesn't it look different between the 2 lines? Even the double quotes are actually different but they don't seem to be affected that much.

So... why is there a weird ' in the sentence? It's a very simple answer, just ask the person who prepared the document did he do it in MS Word? Now... dig into Word's auto correct options and you'll find something like this (varies depending on which version of Word you're looking at)

image

See the part about "Straight Quotes" with "smart quotes"? With that option on, basically when you use a non interesting " or ' Word will replace it with more pleasant looking ones, curvier ones, ones that look nicer when you print. But of course doesn't always work when you put it on a webpage, or a page designed to be viewed from a phone.

Just another one of the weird things you learn after developing web sites for a while

Saturday, July 05, 2008 1:32:50 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, July 04, 2008

When you work with designers, it's very likely that sooner or later they'll come up with a web page design that uses multiple images that need to be joined together to form a display say something like this.

image

Where the yellow cell is actually where your content goes, and the cell below it is supposed to perfectly join up to the cell above to form a single unbreaking image. (Why does my sample suck? Because I can't draw! :P) But sometimes you'll end up with something like this. (The image below is simulated cause I can't get the error to show when I WANT it to! :P)

image

You'll see a gap between your supposedly perfectly joined cells (Usually about 1 pixel, I deliberately enlarged it so it's more visible right now).

Your HTML seems to be fine, with no additional cells, and the fact that you've already turned off cellpadding and cellspacing.

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="300">
        <tr>
            <td>
                <div style="background-color: yellow">
                    I'm in a TD
                </div>
            </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <img src="footer.jpg" />
            </td>
        </tr>
</table>

So you're scratching your head wondering what went wrong. The next time you see a problem like this, remove ALL spaces between the TD tags. So essentially make your HTML look like this.

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="300">
    <tr>
        <td><div style="background-color: yellow">
                I'm in a TD
            </div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td><img src="footer.jpg" /></td>
    </tr>
</table>

Why does it happen? I have no idea, but to fix the problem it's always the same thing. Remove all whitespace from the TD tags. If that still doesn't fix it or you're feeling paranoid, close up the TRs as well.

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="300">
    <tr><td><div style="background-color: yellow">
                I'm in a TD
            </div></td></tr>
    <tr><td><img src="footer.jpg" /></td></tr>
</table>

Again.. I have no idea why it just happens sometimes, but it does, and here's how I fix the problem. More little tips from the trenches to follow.

Friday, July 04, 2008 12:45:36 AM (Malay Peninsula Standard Time, UTC+08:00)  #    Comments [0]  |